About Hellbourne

The photo is of some of nice towns where people drive on the right.

Once it was a most livable city in the world?

Unfortunately, not anymore.

List of The Economist’s most liveable cities:

1. Vienna (98.4)
2. Coppenhagen (98.0)
3. Zurich (97.1)
4. Melbourne (97.0)
5. Calgary (96.8)
6. Geneva (96.8)
7. Sydney (96.6)
8. Vancouver (96.6)
9. Osaka (96.0)
10. Oackland (96.0)

Now it’s the fourth, right? Seriously? What criteria are they using? Have any of those economists actually were there?

As macrobusiness pointed out

There is no way known that Hellbourne is more livable than other Australian cities.

It is cold, angry, crime-ridden, getting poorer, has no economic potential,
and is increasingly crush loaded in every dimension of life.

With a trajectory aimed at 9m people within twenty-five years,
it will be the hell hole of the southern hemisphere.

I don’t know what The Economist is measuring but it sure ain’t Hellbourne!

Let’s make a note to reseatch E’s methodology.